Why won't the Avengers help the "irrelevant" people?

Oct 23, 2017 15:44:03 GMT blockbusted said:

Oct 23, 2017 10:38:53 GMT sostie said:

They seemed to save a lot of "irrelevant" people in the last acts of both Avengers films. Also you still seem to not understand what the phrase means even if he did say it.

And don't rephrase things to suit your argument. Tony Stark never said helping "irrelevant" people was below the Avengers pay grade.

You also seemed to forget to mention all the "irrelevant" people killed in Superman's fight with Zod....but that's ok, he saved a little girl in the next film.

You know... I would've accepted the argument that Superman was too occupied at destroying World Engines if he didn't start to make out with Lois Lane afterwards.

You must hate all the soldiers who came back alive from World War I or World War II and the 1st thing they did was hug or kiss their loved ones.

Superman and Lois had just survived what could've been the end of the world. The natural reaction for anyone surviving such an event is to hug and/or kiss someone they love. There'll be a time to properly mourn those who were killed later on, but for now, the immediate and natural reaction for anyone surviving such an event is to take a moment to take a breath and be glad that you're still alive and to hug and/or kiss someone you love.

There was nothing wrong with Superman and Lois kissing after surviving what could've been the end of the world since that's the natural reaction for anyone surviving such an event. But Steve Rogers waking up after 70 years and instead of asking "Did we win the war?
 or "Who won the war" and instead of being glad and relieved that the war is over, Rogers doesn't care at all about who won the war and is only disappointed that he didn't get to go on a date with Peggy Carter. That's much worst than 2 people sharing a kiss after surviving what could've been the end of the world.