Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 2, 2017 20:47:11 GMT
I haven't read anything on this site in weeks now, and on the eve of going to see Thor for myself, I just found this
www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2017/11/02/thor-ragnarok-is-rotten-tomatoes-highest-ranked-comic-book-movie/#4bd20f3146a3
Forbes highlighting that no comicbook movie had been ranked higher on Rotten Tomatoes. Amazing. I can't wait to see this over the weekend, maybe twice. It's going to rock.
Also from that article:
"As I've said countless times, I wish that folks who discuss Rotten Tomatoes, and that includes Rotten Tomatoes itself, would point out the average critic ranking along with the yay/nay score. Because since a 6/10 is enough for a "fresh" score, using the binary system A) penalizes divisive films, B) creates an impression that a three-star movie has earned near-unanimously rave reviews and C) can sometimes create an impression that a movie is better or worse received than it actually was. The obvious example is Batman v Superman, which had just 27% positive reviews but an average score of 4.9/10. That's still not good, but a proverbial 5/10 looks a lot better than what is perceived by the masses as a 2.7/10 score."
Just to put a little perspective on it.