|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 2, 2017 21:22:00 GMT
From the article: And theres the reason why, when you set the lowest bar possible for the movie to get just a pass by appealing to audiences through visuals and laughs, the aggregate % becomes meaningless. A better indicator would be the metacritic and average score on RT. I've seen more movies than I can remember seeing, char. I've rated 3,400 titles in IMDB. I don't give a rat's rear about art or crap. I like it or I don't. Marvel movies are like the western I watched every week on tv in the 60s. Good guys vs bad guys. Good guys win. Morals taught maybe. That's all I want out of it. I don't need some stupid movie to tell me crap. I've lived enough & seen a lot in 57 yrs. I don't need to take my self worth out of the entertainment I distract myself with as I wait until I can retire. No one is suggesting that these movies should all be deep, literary masterpieces. Im just pointing out the flaws in claiming that an aggregate score isnt a true reflection on the quality of a film. The better parameter should be a score out of 10 like imdb or metacritic. ArchAStanton fanfaring about Ragnarok being highest ranked comic movie is very misleading if you're only looking at RT fresh rating.
|
|