|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 3, 2017 16:29:29 GMT
If it wasn't for him dying, odds are that audiences and critics would've been more willing to notice and point out the films flaws. Like the Joker being omnipotent, the final act being a rush-job and Two-Face being wasted. Or why Harvey Dent was seen as some White Knight when he next to nothing to earn that as opposed to someone like Jim Gordon. Or how there are massive holes in the philosophies Alfred and Dent bring up (Some men just want to see the world burn and "Die a hero or become a villain") yet no one ever challenges them. There are plenty of people who point out flaws in the film, as there are in all films. With Dark Knight, no one was willing to do so for years. If the movie explained what made Dent a "White Knight" I might agree...but it just expected for us to believe in him when he only succeeds thanks to Batman and Gordon. And for whatever reason he's supposed to be "the best of them" when he wasn't. I'm saying that if it weren't for a tragedy shielding the film, those critics would've paid more attention to those flaws.
|
|