Ragnarok #5 in Top 50 CBM

Ragnarok #5 in Top 50 CBM Nov 8, 2017 10:40:23 GMT

Quote

Post by sostie on Nov 8, 2017 10:40:23 GMT

Nov 8, 2017 10:23:30 GMT Tristan's Journal said:

Nov 8, 2017 9:53:03 GMT sostie said:

"Easily" is a bit strong. The main reason WW is top is that it received more reviews...that is the aspect of the formula that gives it a strong adjusted score, yet is has not beaten Thor Ragnarok or SMH on Fresh score, average rating or audience score.

And if WW is at 108%...108% of what?

as they state in the List the weighted Bayesian formulan is bto compensate for different review numbers and other factors to create a sound comparison basis, its like adjustment for inflation , necessary and used with business data, rot tom go through the effort with all genre Films to give a serious overview what is really best reviewed
We had a Poster here who could do percentages calculations and he calculated correctly that Spider-Man will be on four before ro tom punished it. Most Impressive

Right, I'm sure it's been covered many times before, but I still can't understand how adjusted scores can go up and down (as they did in the top 10 of that list over a few weeks in the summer when I was folowing them) whilst RT score, number of reviews - total, fresh and rotten, and average rating all remained the same. What is this mystery factor that seems to vary for each film.

And if it's an adjusted score I assume it's the RT fresh score adjusted. So how can 92% of all reviews be fresh, but when adjusted 108% of all reviews are fresh! How can you have 108% of the total?!!!?

I'm not asking you personally to answer these. I'm just throwing it out there.