Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 13:20:17 GMT
Why shouldn't he care more about one species than another? Why shouldn't anybody? I certainly do.
Well since as you say I may be misrepresenting his views and he isn't here to defend himself, why do you think it's important that humans removed from you by a few generations achieve anything? - It won't benefit you at all. If its importance is nothing to do with what you get out of it then why does it matter which species achieve it?
I think you have the argument slightly backwards, at least as it applies to me. Your assumption seems to be that I do, or should, value human achievements because I like achievement in a general sense. You're saying, if I understand you correctly, that I should want amazing things to be achieved - and therefore, if some non-human intelligence can achieve even more amazing things than humans can, then I should be happy to see the non-human intelligence supplant and even destroy humanity.
But that's not the case at all. I don't value humanity because they achieve things. I value humanity because I am a human. I value human achievements because they are specifically human achievements.
Termites achieve things too. And that's fine; I'm not indifferent to the achievements of termites, they're impressive in their own way. I'm glad we live in a world where there are human achievements and termite ones.
But if it came down to humans or termites, I'd smash every termite in the world in a second to save humanity.
Similarly, I'd be happy to live in a world with AI achievements as well as human ones. I'd want them to be our friends. But if AIs threatened to destroy humanity and replace us with a civilisation that was ten times as smart and accomplished, I would smash every AI in the world tomorrow to save us.