Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 22:17:01 GMT
You're suggesting that a society that seeks its own demise should be considered to be a functional one. I find that a peculiar notion. Well what do you mean by society? There's no global society of humankind at present. Perhaps in the future, society will be a mixture of AI and human. Society is a fairly nebulous term. The world is full of societies, many of them overlapping. Some strictly defined, some not. I have no problem saying that the entirety of human civilisation is one big society. It's just a very loosely bound one. And yes, I'd have no problem with defining a greater society that included humans and AI. I'd also have no problem with humans destroying the AIs if they decided to destroy the rest of the society. Or even if they wanted to destroy chunks of it. At the risk of Godwin, it's really no different from how certain human nations started to be so dangerous to other nations, and so obnoxious in their behaviour within their own borders, that everyone else decided to put a stop to it. Different thing, though. That wasn't one group trying to protect itself from attack by another, but one group trying to prevent another from stopping an ongoing attack upon them. Well, like I said, I'm not about to try and tell other people what they should value. I'm just glad you're in a small minority.
|
|