|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Nov 24, 2017 20:30:29 GMT
Even if it happened to be legal in the context of the film's setting, why make him 17? Was it so hard to rewrite him as 18? It’s a very grey issue in general since several parts of the U.S. apparently have the age of consent at 17, and there are even a couple of parts where it’s as low as 16 (*cough* Alabama). That’s why I think 21 should be the age of consent everywhere in the world. 18 is still too young if you ask me, and no well developed country should have a lower age of consent than any other. You’re right that they could’ve saved themselves some controversy if they had just bumped up the guy’s age though.
|
|