MCU Villains: Why so controversial when criticised?
Dec 1, 2017 17:59:49 GMT
coldenhaulfield likes this
Post by scabab on Dec 1, 2017 17:59:49 GMT
formersamhmd
He had plenty of character, that's why he's considered one of the best characters.
Phenomenally acted, memorable dialogue, unique performance for a villain in an action movie at the time, sophisticated and intelligent villain who everyone remembers from what is a true classic movie.
Iconic enough that plenty of other action movie villains have tried to rip him off with little success.
Well his character for his time, not our time. Plus that's an assumption that doesn't really matter. Hans Gruber was a better villain for 1988 than any Marvel villain is today.
Talia Al Ghul was part of a plot twist that only revealed her character at the end. She didn't have a whole movie as a villain to work with but no she wasn't that good of a villain either.
He has little character or depth, he's memorable for the one-liners and for being played by Alan Rickman and the general quality of the film.
He had plenty of character, that's why he's considered one of the best characters.
Phenomenally acted, memorable dialogue, unique performance for a villain in an action movie at the time, sophisticated and intelligent villain who everyone remembers from what is a true classic movie.
Iconic enough that plenty of other action movie villains have tried to rip him off with little success.
For his time. Put him in a film now and he'll be seen as flat.
Well his character for his time, not our time. Plus that's an assumption that doesn't really matter. Hans Gruber was a better villain for 1988 than any Marvel villain is today.
So it's okay for TDKR to do the same to Talia but GOTG can't do it to Ronan?
Talia Al Ghul was part of a plot twist that only revealed her character at the end. She didn't have a whole movie as a villain to work with but no she wasn't that good of a villain either.