|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Dec 1, 2017 20:14:38 GMT
I'm sure the movie is probably beautiful with great performances and cinematography, but the age thing bothers me a little too. If he was of consenting age maybe not so much. But as he's under, I find it problematic. It technically is of consenting age. If the film was depicting a relationship that’s flat-out illegal, that would be a much bigger problem. I thought consenting age was 18, not 17.
|
|