|
|
Post by Reynard on Dec 2, 2017 1:52:58 GMT
For the director to deny what was going on, does that mean the screenwriter was playing tricks on him and he didn't understand his own film? Perhaps then, Jack Sholder was the wrong choice for director if he was easily fooled. He made a better and nifty film a couple of years later with The Hidden. Heck, John Carpenter— a far superior film-maker—was approached to direct Top Gun-86', picked up on the homoeroticism in it's script and didn't want to do it. Tony Scott made it work and look at the popularity and following that film has now, so Carpenter may be homophobic, but at least he had the insight to see and read between the lines. Otherwise, the director is just going through the mechanical motions of what the script sets out, without having any passion or thoughtful perception of what they are really making. Pretty much like most horror film directors today. I think it's possible that Sholder genuinely didn't understand the subtext and just filmed the script as-it-is. None of his other works I've seen have any kind of subtext that I could find, they are all just typical genre stuff. He seems to be director-for-hire rather than an auteur like Carpenter, who obviously knows how to write themes into his own scripts and properly film them, "read" other director's work and so on. Carpenter is at least very smart if not an "intellectual", a genuine artist, even though he does compromise and is not dead serious about his themes. Oh, and I don't think that not wanting to do Top Gun or any other "gay" movie makes anyone homophobic - a word that gets far too easily thrown around these days anyway.
|
|