Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Mar 11, 2017 3:13:46 GMT
In the 80s Michael Eisner said it was lucky that Disney was now owned by people devoted to good as opposed to evil because the power the company had was awesome (as that pre-school found out when Disney forced them to remove images of Mickey and friends--its unlikely Walt would have cared, since he didnt care that Warner Bros. took the Bugs Bunny design from one of his cartoons).
Modern Disney is a monster.
They hate European heritage with a passion.
They want to promote a globalist monoculture and erase boundaries.
In fact Eisner said it in the 90s--he wanted Disney to be "entertainer for the globe."
Disney was not able to do well without Walt at the helm, but now it has gone into a direction that is quickly validating all those ZOG conspiracy theories.
I dont care if someone is gay, but the idea that it should be normalized in children's films is not tolerance, it is an attack on family cohesion and forcing families to address sex at an early age--and I ask--why?
If Disney was sincere about promoting a peaceful society, it would have kept Tibet in the Dr Strange movie, or it would have its media addressing rape in Europe or critiquing the Iraq invasion (instead of cheerleading for it).
The owners of Disney have the opposite sensibility of Walt-they despise the European, especially the blonde blue eyed Nordic type.
I can see why David Duke is having the best year of his life because the media companies are doing everything possible to validate his conspiracy theories.
I had no problem with Snagglepuss being gay though.
Modern Disney is a monster.
They hate European heritage with a passion.
They want to promote a globalist monoculture and erase boundaries.
In fact Eisner said it in the 90s--he wanted Disney to be "entertainer for the globe."
Disney was not able to do well without Walt at the helm, but now it has gone into a direction that is quickly validating all those ZOG conspiracy theories.
I dont care if someone is gay, but the idea that it should be normalized in children's films is not tolerance, it is an attack on family cohesion and forcing families to address sex at an early age--and I ask--why?
If Disney was sincere about promoting a peaceful society, it would have kept Tibet in the Dr Strange movie, or it would have its media addressing rape in Europe or critiquing the Iraq invasion (instead of cheerleading for it).
The owners of Disney have the opposite sensibility of Walt-they despise the European, especially the blonde blue eyed Nordic type.
I can see why David Duke is having the best year of his life because the media companies are doing everything possible to validate his conspiracy theories.
I had no problem with Snagglepuss being gay though.