Post by reelreviews2 on Dec 4, 2017 6:32:39 GMT
Lets play nice and put it somewhere realistic in the middle.
Does it HAVE to be an extreme when it comes to you and the DCEU? sheesh
At least two of us here (eattheeloi and myself) want to rate the movie a 0/10. That is our HONEST opinion of this worthless stinking turd. We're not doing it to be "jerks". You asked our opinion so we're giving you the hard truth. If the movie had ANY redeeming qualities, I would say so. It doesn't.
The fact Batfleck v. Psuedoman even exists is a slap in the face to fans of these characters, and even to movie audiences in general. It is truly tragic they managed to screw up Batman and Superman's first on screen appearance together on the big screen so badly that it makes Batman & Robin look good in comparison. At least that movie you can have fun mocking how dumb it is.
I'm not going to rate it "somewhere in the middle" because I don't think its an "average" movie. I am certainly objective and don't rate all movies 0 or 10. I rated Star Wars: The Force Awakens a 6/10 because it was decent and fun, but ultimately shallow and pointless. I'll rate Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets a 5/10 because it looks stunning visually and has some clever quips but is a lame predictable action movie that is a waste of time. The Howling II get a 4/10 because its an embarrassing mess but has a great theme song, a clever premise, and Christopher Lee's gravitas is his first and only werewolf movie.
Batfleck v. Pseudoman is complete garbage and insults me by the very fact that it exists and WB gave Hack Snyder and David Goyer MORE money to continue their "vision" for Superman AFTER they screwed it up so badly in the first place. A 1/10 is too good for this pile of dung and implies the movie did something right 10% of the time. It didn't. It FAILS on ALL levels.
0/10