|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Dec 12, 2017 1:30:08 GMT
We're not talking about better or worse, It's not an evaluation of acting and cinematography
We're talking about bigger accomplishment,
And TDK and Indiana Jones aren't bigger accomplishments.
How can you just ignore things like acting and cinematography when you're talking about cinematic achievements? That's like comparing squid without talking about tentacle length or ink viscosity! Oh I'm not ignoring them, it's just not the only factor, or even the primary one. The sheer size and scope and dedication to quality for what they've done isn't circumvented by a single great performance in another film, IMO. Basically the question isn't "are these the best films", because the answer to that would clearly be no. |
|
