Post by general313 on Dec 17, 2017 20:48:53 GMT
Religions often naturally foster a similar perspective in which earthly will is negated by meditating on the universal and eternal, even if the nature of the "universal and eternal" differs among religions. One way they do this IS through art, through stories, parables, allegories and symbols that reinforce those ideas. Take away the "son of God" aspect and the story of Jesus is basically about a man who negates his own will and teaches others to do the same before he's killed by those of the world being negated, and by those who were supposed to be the representatives of the life/philosophy he was teaching and living, but had really just become corrupted by the will/world themselves.
Parsifal is very much about that world where religious symbols have become atrophied and the representatives of that philosophy have been corrupted by the world. Parsifal is the redeemer precisely because he ventures out into the world and becomes empathetic with the suffering it entails. But Parsifal isn't a god-figure redeeming man through his sacrifice; he's more representative of the artist who redeems the value and power of the symbols (and rituals) that were supposed to remind us of these truths and provoke that same empathy. He's very much the "Middle Way" between the sensually indulgent will to life and the ascetically abstract negation of that will. These themes are pretty much encoded into both the music and dramaturgy.
I've read that Guardian piece before, but it's nothing more than a shallow op-ed. The author may have been confused by Parsifal (many were, and still are), but Parsifal is not a "a confusion of Christian and Buddhist themes." The only confusion is in the fact that people can't seem to see past the religious symbolism to the non-religious themes underneath, which is perhaps appropriate since that failure seems to be one of the opera's themes.
It is an interesting point you make about the religious symbolism in Parsifal being used for a message about artistic redemption. I haven't thought of it that way, will have to ponder that idea some more. Regardless of whether Wagner was an atheist or not (I suspect that he may have become more religious toward the end of his life, maybe because of the influence of Cosima), I still find the work very turgid and preachy. Perhaps I lack the intellect and/or patience to get past that. I'm with the author of the Guardian piece: "Give me Tristan and Isolde any day".
I have thought about checking out Evangelion one of these days, but if it is as cloaked in religious symbolism (and missing the sensuous Wagner music) as Parsifal, I wonder if I'd like it much. I am a big fan of Miyazaki's work. How would you compare and contrast those?

