|
|
Post by cupcakes on Dec 19, 2017 11:09:14 GMT
I agree and I've argued with him at length about that. I've been very careful, on countless occasions to be sure that he wasn't just arguing for compatibilist free will, and he has roundly rejected compatibilism on many occasions, whilst remaining vague on what he personally actually means by 'free will'. I hope that you don't think that I'm so dense as to be misconstruing what someone is referring to after 2 years of discussion of the same topic. Cupcakes is conscious that he would look like an idiot if you actually realised what he means when he defends free will, and he wants to avoid that ignominy. To your edit: You're an abject liar and an utter tool. 
Not at all, because it's better for me to suffer than for a greater number of people to suffer. |
|
