3.5 Billion year old fossils confirmed

   As usual your "science" depends on assumptions that it fails to recognize in its reports.  The report does not show how they arrived at their figures.

   One assumption in all carbon dating methods is that cosmic bombardment of the Earth's atmosphere has been constant throughout time.
   A single sample, especially such a small one, might have material from an extraordinary bombardment event or other anomalous condition.  Assuming nothing like that happened then you might have something.  Even if highly accurate what would the information be worth?  Does this mean cancer is cured?  Of course not.

   I suspect you've fallen into yet another trap for people who believe science is "better" than religion or scientists are "smarter" then people who find value in the Bible.  No, the Bible is not a source of information of a scientific nature.  It does not describe how to make a composite bow for example, although that probably did figure in the history of the region.  Religion especially and the Bible by extension have value where science has none.  Science is not solving any political problem because it can only solve problems where everyone agrees what the problem is.  Issues in politics occur because of a disagreement what the problem is.

   Jules Verne wrote some interesting science fiction about a Captain Nemo who opposed war.  In one book Nemo discovers how to make fantastic amounts of food.  His hope being to eliminate wars by eliminating the need to fight over limited supplies of food.  It's just science fiction, and very old science fiction.