|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Dec 21, 2017 9:49:38 GMT
Why would you use radiocarbon dating methods to age date this chert? Because he’s an idiot, and all young earth creationists assume that radiocarbon dating must be the method used to date any fossils, no matter how old, because it’s the only form of radiometric dating whose limitations they half ass understand. I merely pointed out the fact that whatever method was used it was not established in the report how accurate it is. By the way, neither have you established anything. There are assumptions involved in any dating method, including whichever you believe was used here. Most of the assumptions are the same whatever the dating method. You are welcome to believe things you cannot prove. You are not welcome to claim as fact things you cannot prove. I already made total fools of you on the age of the Earth showing you don't know either the original ratio of radioactive elements to their byproducts nor the provenance of any sample you have. So give up already. That one had nothing to do with carbon 14 either. Don't try to blame me for your lack of complete argument. If I have to guess what led to your beliefs, I might guess wrong. That's not my fault. |
|
