Post by blockbusted on Dec 28, 2017 2:16:25 GMT
Let's be honest now. Both films don't really have that many action scenes if you think about it and mostly focus on Peter Parker.
That being said, the latter is considered as one of the best Spider-Man films out of 6 (personally, I think it's the second after 'Spider-Man 2') while the former is considered as one of the worst Spider-Man films out of 6 (and I actually think this IS indeed the worst one).
How did that happen? How did one Spider-Man film lacking in action got so disliked while the other became so well-liked?
P.S. I have my own opinions. What are yours?