Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2018 3:20:15 GMT
But I didn't deny Obama's fiscal year as it pertains to the economy as a whole. In fact, I said that was a legitimate argument. What I said was that Obama's fiscal year has zilch to do with the stock market gains since Trump won in November '16. Regarding that, since you work in the financial markets, I'm sure you can corroborate that the "Trump Bump" was more significant than Republican presidents of the past. Right? Given the health of the stock market when he took office and the carryover effect from the successful policies of yesteryear, such corroboration would be nothing more than baseless conjecture, regardless of which side of the coin I ended up on. What about a statistical analysis of Trump vs. previous Republicans as it pertains to stock market growth first year in office? That's what I am asking you to corroborate. By the way, great answer. Now I believe you when you say you work in finance. A good friend of mine is a financial advisor and if pressed on an honest answer to the query of how much of the market success is owed to Trump, he would've said the same thing, more or less. And he voted Trump.
|
|