|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on Jan 17, 2018 23:47:19 GMT
There was no artistic substance in the decision to characterize Luke Skywalker the way he was characterized in TLJ. It was the culmination of uprooting Luke as a heroic icon. It was getting him out of Rey's way so she wouldn't have to share it with Luke. This has been intentionally calculated over the last 2 films. JJ Abrams rewrote the script for TFA numerous times. Each time he scaled back Luke's role until he was reduced to a cameo. Abrams avoided Luke being a hero of the first film. Rian Johnson wrote Luke as a transformed failure, quitter, and isolationist. It's worthy to note that the original writer of episode IX (Colin Trevorrow) had a more positive vision of Luke. He would've never written this ilk only designed to make all of the male Jedi heroes look incompetent and unnecessary. And to bolster the spotlight on Rey and Leia. This was calculated writing of characters to accomplish agendas with them. Save the ending with Luke there was nothing artistic about it. How they portrayed Luke - I've seen that rehashed characterization of the old male has-been failure a hundred times before from Disney.
|
|