|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jan 22, 2018 12:45:39 GMT
tpfkar The family doesn't have to be involved in an assisted suicide, that would be their choice. So yes, a strawman argument. And it's nobody's business whether a person is assisted to die, other than the person receiving the assistance, and the person giving the assistance. You're suggesting that it's OK to force people to suffering because with your archaic religious principles, you would be "aghast" at the possibility that people could actually be supported in the right to choose. Everyone is involved via the state. And you over and over specifically bemoaned the fact that you couldn't involve your family and friends as they might bring in the authorities to stop you. So of course, straw absurdity, just another in a long line from you. I'm suggesting that any mentally competent person can trivially accomplish the end of their life if they've actually decided, and that the state should do no harm to those whose mental illness is speaking nor should it be used for liquid courage or a venue pure selfish vanity. Not at all, because it's better for me to suffer than for a greater number of people to suffer.
|
|