|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 14, 2017 22:58:35 GMT
I'm not "assigning" any "position" to you. When you create an OP that contains three associated sentences (associated meaning they all revolve around the same subject), the logical connections between them are implied. You denying they exist is you not doing logic. When someone does an argumentum ad absurdum based on those implied connections and you don't get it, that is you not doing logic. There's no way you can spin this that doesn't paint you as severely logic handicapped. Saying you didn't overtly state a position is just you being blind to the aforementioned logical inferences. Then you no longer claim that Divi's statement impacts mine, good. I never claimed someone couldn't reach a conclusion other than how I intended it, or that that they couldn't think something may have been implied. I said I never meant it that way and I even explained how I meant it. I don't know what you mean by "impacts yours." It was an argumentum ad absurdum based on your OP. When you expressed confusion all I said was "you really don't do logic, do you?" meaning that "if you did logic you would've understand how divi's past was related to your OP." Right, but do you not see the implication in calling them "evil" and connecting them with HIV? As if HIV is evidence or a result of their being evil? |
|
