Post by Arlon10 on Jan 25, 2018 13:37:43 GMT
1) I guess the answer to my question is that you're going to keep up with this nonsense in perpetuity, because what you said here ignored everything I said and is just repeating what you said earlier.
2) Believing that the sun will rise/explode tomorrow are both beliefs that require faith, but one is rational and the other is irrational.
3) I might as well quote Yudkowsky, " [ ... ... ] the point is that there are worldviews which try to minimize that imposition [of witch doctoring], and worldviews which glory in it.
Most of the confusion lately comes from using statistical analysis, which I have explained is not the same as the "science" that deserves your accolades. I have studied both and made excellent grades in both. I know whereof I speak. Amateurs note differences in data so small that it only shows up after twenty years then try to dictate which factor caused the change. That is not science. Way too many things change way too much in twenty years to say which "one" factor is responsible. The science you mean to applaud eliminates other factors in order to correctly identify the effects of the one factor of interest. That is ordinarily impossible in statistical analysis scenarios in the news. Do you think the sea will rise drastically tomorrow? It might, you just don't why yet.
if you expect an invisible dragon to heal your daughter of cancer

