SUPERBOWL 52- New England Patriots vs. Philadelphia Eagles ?

SUPERBOWL 52- New England Patriots vs. Philadelphia Eagles ? Jan 28, 2018 8:23:30 GMT

Post by DC-Fan on Jan 28, 2018 8:23:30 GMT

Jan 28, 2018 7:28:18 GMT sdm3 said:

Jan 28, 2018 7:11:40 GMT DC-Fan said:

To this day, THE DUMBEST ARGUMENT EVER is that somehow going 5-3 in Super Bowls when you the favorite in 7 games is better than going 8-0 or 7-1.

When you're the favorite in 7 of 8 Super Bowls and you don't go 7-1 or 8-0, then YOU'RE A FAILURE. And that's exactly what Belicheat and Shady Brady will be if they lose a 3rd Super Bowl to an underdog.

And NO, going 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-whatever is definitely not any better than going 4-0 in the Super Bowl. Saying that " going 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-whatever is better than going 4-0 in the Super Bowl" is as dumb as saying "Loading the bases with nobody out and not scoring is better than a 1-2-3 inning for the offense".

The end result of loading the bases with nobody out and not scoring is no runs. So loading the bases with nobody out and not scoring isn't any better than a 1-2-3 inning. Likewise, the end result of going 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-whatever in the Super Bowl is just 4 wins. So 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-whatever in the Super Bowl is definitely not any better than going 4-0 in the Super Bowl.

Joe Montana played, let's give him 14 seasons as a starter discounting those two years from 91-92 in which he played 0 and 1 games respectively. He made 4 Super Bowl appearances. That means he failed to make the Super Bowl in 10 other seasons. Unless the man was playing against the 72 Dolphins every year I'm pretty sure he lost to some underdogs before even reaching the Super Bowl more often than not. How is that better than losing IN the Super Bowl?

If you load the bases with no outs and you don't score, how is that a better inning than a 1-2-3 inning? The end result is 0 runs scored.

Likewise, if you go 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-whatever in Super Bowls, how is that better than going 4-0 in Super Bowls? The end result is 4 wins.

Jan 28, 2018 7:28:18 GMT sdm3 said:

Tom Brady has literally reached the Super Bowl in half of the seasons in his career as a starting QB. Half.

I've heard many coaches and players say before the season "Our goal is to win the Super Bowl". Tell me, how many coaches and players have you ever heard say before the season "Our goal is to LOSE the Super Bowl"?

Why is it that Patriots fans are so dumb that they can't understand the simple fact that LOSING the Super Bowl isn't any better than all the other teams that didn't win the Super Bowl? The end result is that you're still a loser.

Moreover, if you lose the Super Bowl to an underdog, that makes you an even bigger failure because you underachieved and lost a game that you should've won. If Belicheat and Shady Brady lose this Super Bowl to an underdog Eagles team that was an underdog AT HOME in both their playoff games, that would be equivalent to missing a putt from 6 inches away. It's a HUGE failure!