|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Feb 7, 2018 1:25:39 GMT
Yes, Arlon, I'm well aware of your fallacious Argument from Incredulity ("I can't believe abiogenesis happened, so it must be false") against abiogenesis. It fails on three fronts: one, it fails to disprove abiogenesis (because it's a blatant fallacy); two, even if it was successful, it wouldn't make ID/creationism any more scientific. You don't prove one theory (or even make it a theory) by disproving another theory; and three, it basically ignores all of the research that is actually out there on abiogenesis, an as usual you mistake your ignorance for the ignorance of science. The Miller/Urey experiment is a billion times more scientific/credible than anything that has been produced on the side of ID, which is nothing. Also: Comedy gold! Are you in charge of the rules now? Guess who else thinks they're in charge of the rules? None of you are. I know how the rules work. I know I win in the end. Why? Because open your eyes, that's why. |
|
