|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 8, 2018 11:20:54 GMT
If it was my child then I would offer the same choice and, if the kid believed in heaven , why not use it? The suggestion of heaven, at worst is just a sop to make a bad situation seem a bit better (just as it has worked to assuage people with promises of jam tomorrow for those who suffer on earth, down the millennia). But I know that if it was me, an unbeliever from a young age and my parents had tried it on, it would actually have made things worse, since I would have guessed there was no real answer and they were likely just grasping. I guess I am not one of 'most atheists' then.
And, as an atheist I would be more deeply troubled by the fact that God deliberately created natural evil in the first place - and supposedly takes pleasure in His creation too.
A disease isn't evil though, it seems like it, but it's pure nature and biology. If people can accept the existence of diseases as mere bacteria and a fact of science, why do they suddenly feel it becomes evil just because of the idea of both God and diseases existing? Oh yes I agree my comment was from the point of view of the Bible where at one point God admits point blank to creating evil, which apologists normally weaken down to just natural evil - i.e. calamaties and disasters, whether affecting just the personal or not.
|
|