|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 8, 2018 18:28:21 GMT
tpfkar No, you give them free will as an "argument". Having free will is meaningless as God obviously creates peeps both with free will and with what's needed to get in heaven - he just arbitrarily creates some with all the combination needed and some without. And cause and effect in no what impacts free will, as we're all part and parcel of it, clipping along, doing our thing. And if one actually believes that no actual choice exists, then trying to convince them or anyone of anything one way or another is high irrationality.
Neuroscience and Free Will Are Rethinking Their DivorceYou know where I stand on that, but this time events outside of my control have determined that I'm going to refrain from hijacking the thread to reiterate the same points for the several hundredth time. Sure, I understand you choose to work really hard to get people to choose to change, while simultaneously holding no real choice actually exists. Or as you allude, you know that's kind of way out there, but your hands are doing what they were destined to do since (before?) (the beginning of?) time, regardless of what your brain might be asking of them. As far as "hijacking", you make an assertion, I can disagree with it. Probably will for any I find to be particularly funny. 
Can neuroscience understand Donkey Kong? |
|
