Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2018 19:42:20 GMT
tpfkar You know where I stand on that, but this time events outside of my control have determined that I'm going to refrain from hijacking the thread to reiterate the same points for the several hundredth time. Sure, I understand you choose to work really hard to get people to choose to change, while simultaneously holding no real choice actually exists. Or as you allude, you know that's kind of way out there, but your hands are doing what they were destined to do since (before?) (the beginning of?) time, regardless of what your brain might be asking of them. As far as "hijacking", you make an assertion, I can disagree with it. Probably will for any I find to be particularly funny. 
Can neuroscience understand Donkey Kong?Alright, well I don't understand what you consider to be different about the way decisions get made compared to how I think about decisions come to be made. Merely that your way contains 'free will', which seemingly cannot be isolated from the deterministic process that I've outlined. I don't think that you understand either. |
|
