|
|
Post by You_Got_A_Stew_Goin_Baby on Feb 9, 2018 6:17:26 GMT
Alrighty, so I've read chapter 3, in which Krishna tells Arjuna that he must fulfill his dharma in a selfless state of mind, that is not caring about the results of his actions. So, in order to attain a closer connection to his atman, Arjuna must kill his cousins and their cohorts on the battle field without and hope for glory or whatnot. Seems somewhat sociopathic to me. You're a warrior, and the dharma of a warrior is to fight and kill on the battle field. In order to fulfill your dharma successfully, practice karma yoga, and attain a closer connection with your atman, you must kill and maim with no selfish desire for the potential outcomes...yea, sounds kind of sick-in-the-head. No empathy or concern? Again, if you have a connection with your atman, why the hell should the mortal duties of a particular dharma even matter? Hell, Krishna even mentions the discipline of jnana yoga: that is the contemplative, passive path towards enlightment as a potential path towards reaching a conscious level with Arjuna's atman, but then Krishna just drops it in favor of karma yoga. Later on, Krishna says:
But, isn't Arjuna fighting to put his brother on the throne of Kurukshetra? That is, if Arjuna follows his dharma, and selfishly fights as a warrior, won't he be fighting to fulfill his brothers dharma and not his own (his brother's dharma being the successor to a royal seat)? Is not Arjuna trading his honor for the another's? And, is his brothers intent honerable, or is his brother pursuing earthly, selfish desire? I imagine a lot of this is lost on me because I have not read a whole lot of the Mahabharata backstory, so the whole war seems like a petty dynastic struggle instead of a righteous, holy war.
|
|