|
|
Post by FrankSobotka1514 on Feb 10, 2018 1:10:57 GMT
This isn't confusing. If Foles starts off on pace for 6,000 yards, 75 touchdowns, and a perfect passer rating, the job is sill Wentz's when he's healthy. Wentz is the future of the franchise. Hell, he's the present too. This is no knock on Foles, but Foles isn't Lou Gehrig and Wentz isn't Wally Pipp. Short of raping Howie Roseman's daughter on the 50 yard line on Monday Night Football, the job is Wentz's. There may be three dickheads at the Linc calling for Foles if Wentz struggles in his return, but no one in their right minds thinks Foles should supplant Wentz. So if Wentz isn't ready opening game (which I expect he will be - but there's no set time table)... And Foles starts the season 4-0 - you yank him after that hot start and he won the Super Bowl the previous year. Check.  As for me? I'll take that 1st Round pick - which I'm in awe is being reported - hell - I'll cut bait and take a 3rd. Ok, so in your scenario you're trading Foles. Assuming Wentz won't be ready opening day, who is your QB. Surely not Sudfeld. So I assume you'd sign a free agent. What free agent would be worth it? Some recycled jerk off of the type the Jets always sign? Whoever the Vikings cast off? At that point what would BE the point? Are you hoping someone not on the roster will have a Case Keenum run of luck? Then why not just keep Foles? Roseman and Pederson place a lot of value on the backup QB position. They're not going to get rid of Foles just to get rid of him. |
|
