Post by moviemouth on Feb 11, 2018 7:11:10 GMT
There is a difference between movies not holding up on re-watch and just not having an urge to re-watch the movie.
but with that said... while those two are technically different, as you say, they are very similar in the sense that they have one thing in common in that they are ultimately forgettable because if a movie does not hold up on a re-watch, at least to a certain level, then you won't want to re-watch it anymore and in the other example of 'not having a urge to re-watch a movie' pretty much means the movie is not good enough to re-watch (as it does not spark your interest in it enough to see it again) which also makes that forgettable basically.
For me the true worth of a movie doesn't depend on wanting to re-watch it but in how it effected me when I watched it the first time. There might not be any need to re-watch certain movies I love because I carry those movies with me in my mind at all times, they speak to me on a deep personal level and have changed my life in ways.
also, I never really understood that whole 'changed my life' comment even though I have heard it here and there. I never had a movie 'change my life' as they are simply general entertainment at the end of the day. I never really seen a movie that changed my outlook on life etc, at least nothing major. you might see a movie that reminds you to appreciate things a bit more here and there but nothing that was profound.
Movies I re-watch the most tend to be for entertainment most of the time, but movies that are mostly fun type movies aren't movies that leave a lasting impression on me even if I tend to re-watch them more than movies I consider great artistic and thematic achievments.
that's one thing I might be a bit different on... some people seem to put the word 'entertainment' as only simple blockbuster movies and excludes more serious dramas etc. but I don't see things that way as movies ultimately come back to ones all around enjoyment of watching them and the more it does that the higher the score and the less it does that the lower the score. sometimes the blockbusters really work and sometimes dramas work. off the top of my head 'Crime | Drama' (and variations) tend to be one of the safer genres for me to output a quality movie.
Then there are the many people who judge movies on an objective level. Some people may find Batman & Robin more fun to re-watch than The Godfather for example, but they consider The Godfather the better movie. Even you have to admit that this is a pretty common way of thinking.
I mean they are objective to a point.
but to play along with your Batman vs The Godfather type of thing... I can see the term 'fun' might be applied more to some movies than others. but at the end of the day... whichever movie is more interesting for the viewer to watch is the better/more enjoyable movie for them.
p.s. but I do admit I have seen people say that stuff in your example there around here.
We are basically just way too different too be able to agree on much.
We both seem to like Jerry Maguire though.

