|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 12, 2018 0:13:57 GMT
tpfkar No, I didn't miss the part where you're a religious wacko projecting wildly. Wanting to forcefully violate countless and kill everyone for your death cult, even the other deranged, as opposed to supporting them to get through their illness. You even called successful treatment for them "brainwashing". And of course your really truly sane brilliance that killing someone instantly by putting a bullet into their brain not is "harming" them. And your further "libertarian" care for the mentally ill of wishing to make them available for sexual mutilation and as human meals for predators, as long as the mentally ill "assent" to it. And regardless of the ridiculousness of your patent illogic, even if one stipulated free will via some magic or another like your Great Objective, things would still only happen one way.
Does Free Will Exist?You did gloss over the religious dimension to your own beliefs. "Get it while you can before you're dirt" doesn't imply anything about an overreaching government placing restrictions on one's freedom to seek out an end to one's existence, which may include involving consenting third parties who are willing to offer their services and products in order to ease the process along. So what you're responding with is a strawman argument, because as you know, I don't have any problem with the "get it while you can before you're dirt" part. And I've always maintained that free will, in any meaningful sense, would be logically impossible under any scenario that could be imagined by the human mind. The only "religious dimension" is your awe and reverence of religion, borne of your own rabid religiosity and further evidenced by your continual cult framings. Regardless of your supplication to it, religion is the product of man and not the source of ideas like valuing life and protecting the vulnerable. Of course restrictions on third parties from sexually mutilating, eating and killing the mentally ill is not "restrictions on one's freedom to seek out an end to one's existence", it's protection from the murderous sexual psychopaths about. If one of sound mind has truly decided to end their own life it is a trivial physical process. Acting out and getting others involved and the authorities' notice is ironclad evidence of some combination of mental incompetence and motivations other than actual death. And of course, your strawman prattle is ludicrous, as "get it while you can before you're dirt" is wholly incompatible with the Catholic faith or your cult faith or any other projection you sillily try to throw up. Also I understand that you have such a need for free will to be something you can ineptly, counterproductively use against competitor religions, that you can't process stipulated hypotheticals. Or just don't have the cognitive competence, of course.
Moreover, it may be possible to spray a chemical in the world's air, or add something to the water supply that would prevent women from becoming pregnant. It wouldn't be necessary to ban sex. Alternatively, we could develop an AI that would peacefully and swiftly wipe out all sentient organisms on Earth, perhaps by releasing some kind of toxin into the air. |
|
