Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2018 16:23:19 GMT
"Deader" Is by far the worst title, in series with generally really bad titles overall past the first one... But it is among the less terrible movies in the series. I know people really like part 2, but I remember it being extremely cheesy and having really shoddy and laughable effects and an overly simple story line with 2 main characters who I didn't care about at all. But I haven't seen it in a while. I also remember not actually hating 'Bloodline' all that much, even with the whole Pinhead in space lame novelty act. I remember thinking that the different timelines weren't such a bad approach and sort of reinforced the ancient and timeless aspect of the demonic nature of the cenobites, or whatever. But I haven't seen that one in a while either, and my expectations were extremely low, so I think I was probably just surprised. Maybe if I saw them again I'd rate it a little lower and part 2 a little higher, but I do not feel any real compulsion to do so. Hellworld fucking sucked though. The only reasons to see it are if you are completionist, if you wanna see a young pre-Superman Henry Cavill, or if you can tolerate an awful movie as long as it features Lance Henrikson. I'm in awe of how some regard II the best in the franchise and hold it over I. To each their own - we all have different tastes - but I think it was highly overrated and to me - gore does not equal a good movie. Plus the acting was abysmal (the mute chick who looked like Brad Pitt). Also - I get hated on for this viewpoint - I know hardcore fanboys state the Hellraiser movies were not about Pinhead. Well guess what? He's an iconic Horror Icon. One of the best out there. And the way he went down so easily to Dr. Chanard - just kind of left a bad taste in my mouth.
|
|