Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2018 18:37:01 GMT
tpfkar It's relevant to the fact that you're claiming that a mentally ill person's request to die doesn't reflect their actual feelings, regardless of how many times they repeat it with conviction. And you've just ignored the question about whither this 'value' derives that you wish to conserve. "Don't harm, especially the mentally ill" leaves the person vulnerable to the harm that they want to escape and only 'harms' them from the perspective of those who will not be the ones receiving the treatment. There's no justification why the 'harm' as others perceive it should be considered more important than the harm that the patient is actually enduring and will continue to endure. "Actual feelings" and rational wants outside of the illness are two different things. People derive "value" from all manners of subjective sources. Personally I don't like pathetic, narcissistic crazies trying to curtail peoples chances to experience this one short time period, based on the morbid psychopath's personal first-world miseries. And I'm empathetic in that if I became deranged I'd certainly like to be helped and not killed upon derangement or great stress and upset. And there's no justification for your absurd redefinition of countless words.  Violence in this case would be the imposition of needs, wants and the potential for suffering by way of the creation of new life.Whose chances to to live would be 'curtailed' by not being born? And you're so empathetic that even if you wanted to die, you wouldn't want to die. Well done.
|
|