Did vibranium make Wakandans so barbaric and bloodthirsty?
Feb 20, 2018 8:53:47 GMT
taylorfirst1, formersamhmd, and 2 more like this
Post by dazz on Feb 20, 2018 8:53:47 GMT
Well that was dull and repetitive, if you wish to repeat yourself to inflate the size of your post in try finding different ways to say the same thing not just repeat the exact same phrasing every other line.
As for the point of your post or should I say the question posed in the post as we all know the point isn't to actually ask any question more so a ruse to allow you to bitch about something MCU related as it's all you do, but to the question no it's not due to vibranium.
You seem to mistake technological advancement with them evolving beyond their traditions, Wakanda is famously an isolationist culture they only rarely interact with outsiders and only ever to really benefit their own agenda or needs, Wakandan culture is technologically advanced but still deeply rooted in it's past, you add this to the fact that the leader of Wakanda is also typically either the Black Panther or were the Black Panther the nations greatest warrior and proving oneself in combat for the right to lead also makes sense.
If anything the ritual combat of leaders to determine who should lead is far more peaceful, I don't know as I haven't seen the film yet if T'Challa has to fight to be allowed to call himself king or if he is challenged and his ascension to the throne is just a time when any who wish to may challenge more easily, this negates large scale war between tribes limiting the number of deaths to a single person instead of hundreds or thousands which is far more civilised than open warfare, even with Killmongers challenge it makes sense rather than a violent coup where the royal families allies are divided leading to civil war, a member of the family can simply challenge for the right to lead, again limiting the deaths of the Wakandan people.
Considering that Wakanda recognises a monarchy not an elected government violence is the only way to force change in leadership, hell even with elected government's violence is also a tool to force regime changes, the fact Wakanda has a sacred and honoured method in which to allow for the change and yet protect it's people at the same time is far from barbaric, bloodthirsty, primitive or any other crap you want to call it, but we all know you don't care you just want to shit on the film.
Also the whole fight to the death thing also keeps the right to challenge from being meaninglessly used, only those willing to die will challenge, so people wont do it as a lark, it keeps the crown as being something only few who have strong convictions will go for, if theres no risk anyone would challenge, even those who have no business leading.
As for the point of your post or should I say the question posed in the post as we all know the point isn't to actually ask any question more so a ruse to allow you to bitch about something MCU related as it's all you do, but to the question no it's not due to vibranium.
You seem to mistake technological advancement with them evolving beyond their traditions, Wakanda is famously an isolationist culture they only rarely interact with outsiders and only ever to really benefit their own agenda or needs, Wakandan culture is technologically advanced but still deeply rooted in it's past, you add this to the fact that the leader of Wakanda is also typically either the Black Panther or were the Black Panther the nations greatest warrior and proving oneself in combat for the right to lead also makes sense.
If anything the ritual combat of leaders to determine who should lead is far more peaceful, I don't know as I haven't seen the film yet if T'Challa has to fight to be allowed to call himself king or if he is challenged and his ascension to the throne is just a time when any who wish to may challenge more easily, this negates large scale war between tribes limiting the number of deaths to a single person instead of hundreds or thousands which is far more civilised than open warfare, even with Killmongers challenge it makes sense rather than a violent coup where the royal families allies are divided leading to civil war, a member of the family can simply challenge for the right to lead, again limiting the deaths of the Wakandan people.
Considering that Wakanda recognises a monarchy not an elected government violence is the only way to force change in leadership, hell even with elected government's violence is also a tool to force regime changes, the fact Wakanda has a sacred and honoured method in which to allow for the change and yet protect it's people at the same time is far from barbaric, bloodthirsty, primitive or any other crap you want to call it, but we all know you don't care you just want to shit on the film.
Also the whole fight to the death thing also keeps the right to challenge from being meaninglessly used, only those willing to die will challenge, so people wont do it as a lark, it keeps the crown as being something only few who have strong convictions will go for, if theres no risk anyone would challenge, even those who have no business leading.