|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Feb 25, 2018 21:57:48 GMT
Maybe, if the law was written to guarantee that registration would not lead to confiscation. I've even said on another board that I could support raising the minimum age on buying semi-automatic weapons to 25. How would registration lead to confiscation? I mean I would expect that if you were found to have 20 guns and be the head of a large hate group that might be grounds for confiscation, but I can't see a scenario where just registration would lead to that. You're asking how something would happen that has already happened. California required registration of several types of firearms in the 90s. Then the following law was put in place with respect to SKS rifles after the state knew who owned them: 30720. (a) Any person, firm, company, or corporation that is in possession of an SKS rifle shall do one of the following on or before January 1, 2000: (1) Relinquish the SKS rifle to the Department of Justice pursuant to subdivision (h) of former Section 12281. (2) Relinquish the SKS rifle to a law enforcement agency pursuant to former Section 12288, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 19 of the Statutes of 1989. (3) Dispose of the SKS rifle as permitted by former Section 12285, as it read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994. (b) Any person who has obtained title to an SKS rifle by bequest or intestate succession shall be required to comply with paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (a) unless that person otherwise complies with paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of former Section 12285, as it read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994, or as subsequently amended. (c) Any SKS rifle relinquished to the department pursuant to this section shall be in a manner prescribed by the department.
|
|