|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Feb 25, 2018 22:14:30 GMT
So registration enabled them to enact a law to confiscate this particular model of firearm but registration wasn't instrumental in the confiscation? I hope I'm misunderstanding you here. Yeah a bit, or maybe we are misunderstanding each other. The registration was instrumental in enacting the confiscation, but the type of rifle was illegal regardless of registration, so the registration was not what caused the confiscation. I cannot see how registration was a bad thing in this instance, unless you want to own an illegal weapon. The SKS was perfectly legal in California prior to the registration. The confiscation law was enacted AFTER the registration was completed. |
|
