|
|
Post by gadreel on Feb 25, 2018 22:17:44 GMT
Yeah a bit, or maybe we are misunderstanding each other. The registration was instrumental in enacting the confiscation, but the type of rifle was illegal regardless of registration, so the registration was not what caused the confiscation. I cannot see how registration was a bad thing in this instance, unless you want to own an illegal weapon. The SKS was perfectly legal in California prior to the registration. The confiscation law was enacted AFTER the registration was completed. Sure, but that does not mean that the registration was part of the confiscation, unless you claim that they only enacted the confiscation because of the registration, or that they would not have made it illegal if there was no registration. |
|
