|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 17, 2017 19:38:46 GMT
No it doesn't.
Your view means next to nothing because you suck at explaining it.
Your view does not have the capability of being persuasive.
Sure it does. That's why you see atheist groups everywhere and a general rise in their population.
What is it I haven't explained about my view? Let me know and I'll be happy to clarify.
This is your problem.
Being persuasive has nothing to do with me being interested in what you have to say.
It's about you getting me interested in what you have to say and, again you suck at it.
David Dawkins is an idiot. I think we can all agree on that. However, he is popular specifically because he knows how to manipulate his bone headed arguments into a way that appeals and persuades the people who didn't think about things the way he does...Just like any other popular religious zealot and regardless of how wrong it is.
You don't have that and probably never will.
It is a disservice to let you go on thinking that your message is similar to the message of the more "powerful" theophobiacs/groups out there because you simply have nothing to say that is capable of anyone saying "That's a good point" except those already drinking the Kool-Aid.
|
|