Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 17, 2017 21:33:23 GMT
This is your problem.
Being persuasive has nothing to do with me being interested in what you have to say.
It's about you getting me interested in what you have to say and, again you suck at it.
David Dawkins is an idiot. I think we can all agree on that. However, he is popular specifically because he knows how to manipulate his bone headed arguments into a way that appeals and persuades the people who didn't think about things the way he does...Just like any other popular religious zealot and regardless of how wrong it is.
You don't have that and probably never will.
It is a disservice to let you go on thinking that your message is similar to the message of the more "powerful" theophobiacs/groups out there because you simply have nothing to say that is capable of anyone saying "That's a good point" except those already drinking the Kool-Aid.
So I'm not interesting, and yet here you are. I appreciate your ranking system though.
What kool-aid do you think I'm drinking? Everything I promote is based purely on evidence.
I'm not here for you except to make fun of you on occasion and drop some much needed knowledge that you have no intention of listening to.
If you would like to post some times that we had any significant conversations, then be my guest.
Right now you are completely ignoring something I said in order to discuss what I said in a way that you want to discuss which must be some kind of atheist calculus problem only they can grasp.
Whatever it is, it is not power of persuasion
Your threads, on the basis of their simplistic nature, just attract others to it and I have conversations with them. You just try to interject every so often and, as is your custom, you don't have any foundation to discuss.