|
|
Post by Salzmank on Mar 15, 2018 22:19:10 GMT
I never thought of that. Now that you mention it... Isn't Nathan a better choice than Zero? I mean, he's supposed to seduce so many old women. The seduction and the con-artistry, yes. But the character’s also supposed to be (as I wrote) a dirty, greasy slob—no redeeming virtues. Lane gets the first two characteristics down but not the latter two, and I think that’s because they’re trying too hard to make him look like a convincing con-artist. And he’s not really supposed to be a conman in the style of The Sting or House of Games (or Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, which I mentioned above) |
|
