Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 1:53:52 GMT
Dude, why don't you try dealing with what I actually write for a change....you know...instead of making extra shit up?! Where did I say that all critics "agreed" to inflate WW's ratings?  Critics watched WW and were probably delighted when they realized they wouldn't have to shit all over yet another DCU movie (bump). It's a blockbuster superhero movie led by a woman. Given the present climate, that's culturally significant (bump). Maybe they are predisposed to wanting to see a movie like this do well (bump). So you’re suggesting that they universally decided to go easy on the film for their own personal agendas? Did I get that right? Also, your assessment that critics have some PC agenda when it comes to reviewing movies, but not towards the “bad” movies doesn’t work. If critics did have a political agenda, why would they care if the movie is good or bad? Their readers wouldn’t take them seriously either way if they think they have an agenda in mind. 29 critics didn't like the movie. I'm sure a number of critics also reviewed the movie fairly. So obviously they didn't "universally" go easy on the movie. A significant number did overrate the movie though.  If a movie clearly sucks ass then any critic giving it a largely positive rating stands out from the crowd......not in a good way. If a movie critic's opinion can't be trusted to be an honest reflection of what they actually think then they are extremely unlikely to foster a large readership and become successful. 
|
|