Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead?

Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead? Mar 18, 2018 19:22:49 GMT

Quote

Post by formersamhmd on Mar 18, 2018 19:22:49 GMT

Mar 18, 2018 16:41:11 GMT thisguy4000 said:

Mar 18, 2018 16:35:54 GMT formersamhmd said:

They made fun of the voice because it started in 2005, before Dark Knight, which made it acceptable. If the voice thing had started in TDK in 2008, they wouldn't make fun of it anymore.

Who criticizes Joker being omnipotent? All I ever hear is how wonderfully it fit the film and its themes and other garbage.

That music video doesn't mean a thing.

Actually, the Batman voice in BB wasn’t as growly as it was in the later two films. People didn’t truly begin making fun of the voice until TDK came along.

The Joker was not “omnipotent”. He showed a tendency for meticulous planning, but his plan ultimately ended up failing when those people on the ferries didn’t blow each other up like he wanted.

They were still taking shots at the voice then too, which is why the complaints about it are acceptable by Nolanites.

He was. He succeeded at EVERYTHING because blowing up the yachts wasn't his real plan, corrupting Dent was. Of course, if Gordon and Batman had brains they'd have been able to spin that in a way that protected Dent but Nolan didn't think about that.