Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead?

Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead? Mar 18, 2018 20:26:57 GMT

Quote

Post by formersamhmd on Mar 18, 2018 20:26:57 GMT

Mar 18, 2018 20:15:12 GMT thisguy4000 said:

Mar 18, 2018 20:06:36 GMT formersamhmd said:

It was still there though, but even if they started making more fun of the voice in TDK that still doesn't avoid that they ignored all the stuff about TDK they SHOULD have criticized but never did because they feared backlash.

It was the one thing he cared about more than anything else except Batman. Last we saw him, he was feeling victorious.

Same way they got people to believe Batman randomly killed some Cops. Just say they got killed in the random chaos happening due to Jokers' terrorism. No one was there to say Dent did anything.

I’m really tired of going over with with you but TDK has been criticized for plenty of things. It just so happens that the vast majority of people would agree that whatever shortcomings the film has are by no means enough to outweigh its strong points.

Last we saw the Joker was before Batman decided to take the fall for Dent, in order to prevent the Joker from winning.

What you’re suggesting is that they blame the Joker for the deaths. Again, that would raise a number of questions and if the Joker and his goons specifically deny killing those particular people, it would prove to be problematic.

What other things? The voice, that's nothing!

Because by taking the fall, Batman compromised himself and Joker still won.

Who'd believe them? It's easier to blame Joker than for people to think Dent did anything. Batman and Gordon don't even consider anything other than "Batman takes the fall". Pure laziness.