Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead?

Is the “WW got good reviews because feminism” argument dead? Mar 18, 2018 21:15:24 GMT

Quote

Post by formersamhmd on Mar 18, 2018 21:15:24 GMT

Mar 18, 2018 21:02:37 GMT thisguy4000 said:

Mar 18, 2018 20:44:57 GMT formersamhmd said:

You ever see anyone point out the holes in the "Die a hero or become a villain" or "Some men just want to watch the world burn" philosophies? Because they have them.

By compromising, Batman still caused Joker to win.

And they could easily spin it in a way to protect Dent and not have Batman take the fall. If they had brains.

It is, they can say Joker is lying and no one would question it. Or just blame Joker and not let let anyone interview him.

If Batman can take the fall when there's no evidence he did anything, Joker can be blamed easily.

If you’re asking whether or not people have complained about the “die a hero” and “watch the world burn” speeches being on the nose, there are plenty of people arguing that.

Could have fooled me.

Blaming the Joker really isn’t as easy as you think. If they chose to blame the the Joker for the deaths of Dent and the people he killed, it would raise a number of questions such as when exactly the Joker found time to do that. Plus, the Joker was already in custody when Dent died, so Batman and Gordon would have to find a way to plant evidence in order to frame him.

There's no evidence Batman killed anyone, yet they're able to pull off framing him. And no one knew where Joker was for a lot of the movie, plenty of time to say he was killing people.

As for Dent, just say he wandered off from the hospital and then died from his wounds. No need to say Joker killed him.