Post by themanwithnoshame on Mar 19, 2017 18:04:20 GMT
if ashwin can do atleast 50-60% of what he has done in the subcontinent, he will be considered as a legend.
www.impactindexcricket.com/best-of-impact-index-category/why-four-of-iccs-six-awards-have-gone-to-the-wrong-man/
They are too much obsessed with context and result. Just look at this
"Look at the context of the two innings.
Du Plessis scored 119 off 56 balls in a team score of 231. Moreover, West Indies went on to chase the target with four balls to spare. The second-highest scorer in the match was Chris Gayle with 90 runs.
Van Wyk’s unbeaten knock of 114 off 70 balls came in a team score of 195. West Indies went on to lose the match by a margin of 69 runs with Lendl Simmons being the next highest scorer of the match with 49 runs.
So, they voted in Du Plessis’ innings based on what – for playing 14 balls less and scoring 5 more runs? Without considering any kind of context?"
These guys blame Du Plesiss for the failure of his team mates. Ring any bells?
Yes, the average rabid Dravid fan blames Tendulkar for every stellar performance of his where he was let down but his team mates and his team lost. How is that even logical?