If you could be a God...

If you could be a God... Mar 31, 2018 9:52:47 GMT

Quote

Post by cupcakes on Mar 31, 2018 9:52:47 GMT

^tpfkar

Mar 30, 2018 23:16:53 GMT @miccee said:

Mar 30, 2018 1:23:35 GMT cupcakes said:

Just another flat-out lie from you, sur-prise sur-prise. (Apple) Smiling Face With Smiling Eyes

You go on and on about the imposition done to the empty spaces in the future, and I just note that if you want to go that route then all must be considered about these future creatures. And that your personal psychopathic preferences mean nada save humor against the actual extant making the call when they're able. Peeps are having a blast; even you, it's just you enjoy your particular nurtured miserableness and delusions of having some impact (at least in the direction you think) outside of ranting youtube crazies.

And just read again - it's not just the mentally competent that want their hands on the stuff, it's also the treatable despondent and as you demonstrate well, the wannabe lady-abusing mass-murdering loons. At least try to follow minimally.

And you've ranted multiyear at this point about "imposition"s to the nonexistent, coupled with the not-imposition of exterminating them. trumpshrug

Among countless other of your patent derangements.

On that note, you've also called me "deranged", which is the mental illness equivalent of "n*****"

I haven't lied about anything. You've stated that there would be something wrong with a universe in which there is no sentient life, and when you justify bringing children into the world, you point out that they will have a chance to 'have a blast', as if there were any problem with non-existent people not getting to have that chance. If there is a moratorium on bringing sentient creatures into existence, then nothing needs to be considered about them, and there's no problem which will ever need to be solved on their behalf. Deciding to cause someone to exist is not a humanitarian rescue mission for deprived spiritual entities. And if you think that people should have the right to 'make the call', then that suggests giving them all the means that can possibly be provided in order to be facilitated in either choice; not giving them a problem that they must solve without any help at all.

There's no secular reason why anyone shouldn't have that substance, as long as it was for strictly personal use. And it had already passed through customs, so wherefore the need to forcibly enter someone's home and steal it from someone who was only going to use it for themselves (and was 'mentally competent' by any reasonable standards)?

(Apple) Smiling Face With Open Mouth & Closed Eyes

You lie nearly nonstop. I said for normal non-deranged peeps that life is good and wiping out all life would be baaaaaad. Sane non-psychopathic non-wallowing human kind of a thing. Whatever you're tying to crap-squish in via vapid semantics with "wrong/problem" is just a bit part of your continuous crassly deranged boneheaded insipidity. You can "as if there were" out your twitted arse until your AI savior comes home. A universe with life is a great thing, at least life as we know it, and without would be berry berry sad, from the perspective of uncrushed undemented peepizoids, of course.

And sorry, but patently coo-coo from you doesn't yield nonsecular, regardless of your indifference to (har, more like your enthusiasm for) the great cost to the vulnerable, and access by murderous crazies, and your personal wish that the mentally ill be available for fellow predators to be subject to whatever barbarity you can get the poor confused ill persons to assent to. What's wild is that even such psychopathy pales in comparison to your whimsical dreams of the forced mass-sterilization of women and mass-murder of countless of all types.

Not at all, because it's better for me to suffer than for a greater number of people to suffer.