If you could be a God...

I never objected to "get it while you can before you're dirt", and to keep raising that is a strawman. The only issues at stake are whether it's ethical to rope someone else into existence without their consent, or any reason to think that they needed that existence; and also whether or not everyone who is born ought to have the undisputed and fully legally supported right to terminate their existence in the easiest, most painless, most reliable and most convenient fashion that medical technology can provide. Your repeated mantra references neither of those ethical questions, and then you go on to assert a right to a) gamble with someone else's welfare by creating needs where previously there were none; and b) prevent people from accessing whatever means of assisting in dying would be of greatest convenience to them and would put their mind at rest.

There is no coherent argument to be made for saying that it's in the best interests of someone who wants to die to be prevented from doing so in a swift and painless way. The person who dies by that means will never have any future interests which will supercede the ones that they were invested in at the time of requesting assistance to die.