Post by cupcakes on Mar 31, 2018 18:21:20 GMT
tpfkar
Mar 31, 2018 4:27:17 GMT @miccee said:
Absolutely mind-blowing that those that support it support it, who would have ever thunkit. You must be trembling with something or another. Crazy that the guys who have an agenda breeze over the basic end-arounds to their lines. And as many times run over, people do of course have the right to die; they can't practically be stopped if they don't exhibit signs of mental illness. That doesn't mean Nembutal for all and the vulnerable be damned, and who cares about the murderous youtube psychopaths about. You have yapped about the impositions on the nonexistent continuously, always yabbering about what they don't need. And sterilization ain't for fetuses, my whacked-out brothah. But mental illness is still a terrible thing.
And to add to this, the people who give birth are the ones who are sentencing people to death in the first place
"Vulnerable be damned" means forcing the vulnerable to be tortured by their vulnerabilities with no recourse except 'treatments' that have already been tried and failed. It doesn't mean offering them the peaceful and humane end to their suffering that they have requested in no uncertain terms. But in your valuation system, suffering is meaningless and death is the only consideration, so an end to conscious experience where harm cannot be experienced is somehow the most harmful outcome of all, even when this is what the person concerned expressly wished for and was desperate to bring about.
What the non-existent don't need isn't saying anything about impositions on the non-existent, it is stating that they can't be imposed upon and it isn't a condition from which anybody needs to be rescued.
The fact that it's not doesn't lead anybody with a mind not shattered to want society to ignore everything else in the world.And "vulnerable be damned" is just a summation of the callous and pathological "believing" if some distraught kid breaking up offs himself then no harm was done in any circumstance. Or if you or another psychopath put a bullet into his brainpain, no harm no foul if he never knew about it. Sorry, mostly baseline healthy-minded people would like such situations avoided and the distraught instead treated, or as you like to say "brainwashed".
Going on and on about what the nonexistent don't need and the need for sterilization, and even mass murder as antidote to the "imposition" of just letting them have the easily rejected option, is just sample your par-for-the course crazytime.
"Non-consciousness cannot be turned into some form of torture, and therefore I believe that it is morally unacceptable to put someone at risk of harm for a gain which is both ephemeral and unnecessary. The positive is unnecessary, because nothing would have been lost and there would be no deprivation in the event that consciousness were not created to begin with. Whether you are a deity creating sentient life, or a parent procreating."
Who is being put at risk now? Keep jabbering about those that don't exist.
Or how you're not as you continuously do and introduce babble-talk about them being "rescued" or it's opposite or what-babble-not. On that note, you've also called me "deranged", which is the mental illness equivalent of "n*****"